Score: 8

"Roffle."

submission: Mass Vote This

date: May 19, 2005

"You didn't earn enough VP to mass-vote your movie through". That must be the best game over line ever :D

An ok music, cool background and an very simple, addictive game. I like it.

SevenStar is such an evil voter, he blammed my awesome .swf a few times :(

aaaa!

Score: 9

"Brillant masterpiece."

submission: 100FPS Fun

date: May 19, 2005

haha, j00b's flash was probably the funniest. Great parody of the worst flash series on NG and yes, that stupid squirrel says "fat bastard" way too often.

NB's game was very simple but at least it was fun for a few seconds. Was it a human penetrating a chicken? I remember that image on his UCFD's avatar, it rocks.

Dizfunktion's flash looks like a parody of interactive body :O
It sure was original.

mp3 and Tv_vision's parts weren't as good as the others but they still entertained me.

Good job guys, this flash is going in my favorites.

*Insert pointless signature here*

Score: 7

"heh, it was pretty good"

submission: deletemac02

date: May 7, 2005

Very entertaining and not as buggy as the previous versions.

It was a very good idea and I liked this flash-chat until it broke :(

Hopefully, another flash like this one will be submitted in the future :P

Score: 10

"Best one yet."

submission: SS Time Trials 5

date: April 11, 2005

Twostar: best april fools ever, I wish it was true in real life but these guys don't seem to have any sense of humor. :( Oh well, Internet will always be there to virtually modify the reality with its awesomeness. :P

AubergineLock: Very entertaining and the animation was pretty good. Hitler + goatse = winning team.

j00bie: possibly the funniest flash of this time trial. (THE THUMB: UP!!)

chrome: A great tribute for a great guy. :D

mp3lock: bah, wasn't the best of this time trial but it was still amusing.

I should really check the previous time trials. I probably missed some short flashes as funny and entertaining as these ones. Keep up the great work guys.

_E_<Rgs>_K_

Score: 0

"EKRegulus' Rant I"

submission: Foamy's Rant V

date: March 2, 2005

Are you sick and tired of overrated artists that keep submitting the same stuff every week which gets voted up by a huge fanbase that never learned how to vote fairly? Then the other artists that actually deserve something don't receive the awards that they should earn. Aren't you tired of that? Well, I am. Even worse, their "animation" is similar on all their flashes so they are mostly recycling old frames. Moreover, their characters have very annoying voices and they complain all the time about stuff that doesn't matter at all, especially the main character of the cartoon.

And it doesn't end there:
There is only one background, one camera angle, no plot, the main character who doesn't have a mouth disappears at the bottom of the screen everytime that he ends a sentence and he pops back on when he starts another one. I mean, one author has 70 animations exactly like that, what's so original about this one?

Since I MUST be constructive (something that I don't really want to be because you don't care about the suggestions. Hell, I bet that you don't even read the reviews), here's a few things that you could change so this cartoon doesn't irritate me as much as it usually does:

-More camera angles, zooms and backgrounds. You did that in the past, why not doing it again?
-Add more moves instead of the usual limited animation on the face and the arms, animate the squirrel's mouth. More animating work = more quality! Get it?
-You could change Foamy's voice. I mean, why not?
-Insert a plot or a new character in the cartoon. New character doesn't mean a naked goth or a squirrel on drugs.. we need to see a new and refreshing character.
-Make something different for once. How about that? Wouldn't that be great?
Think about it. Most authors modify their animation, plot, characters and/or audio on every new submission that they worked on, why won't you do the same?

Anyone clicking this review as abusive really needs to check the FAQ (which contains the whistling rules) again because there is nothing wrong with it.

_E_<Rgs>_K_

Score: 5

"Better than the original..."

submission: NUMA man...

date: February 22, 2005

Graphics: The images could be traced but at least you are currently the only numa numa flash on NG with animation instead of being someone dancing in front of a webcam so you easily deserve a better score than the other flashes on the same subject. It would obviously be better if you would add more animation beside the main dancer on the screen. Moreover, you could also give your character some eyes and a mouth while animating both. It would improve the overall quality of the animation. BTW, you didn't need to exactly copy what the other guy did, you could insert even more original moves (I noticed a few) next time :)

Sound: There was only some music, no voice or sound effects (or not much) so it will hurt the score. The music starts to annoy me but the quality is similar to the other numa numa submissions so you get a 8. A very generous 8.

Style: Numa numa flashes are overdone and boring but this one is the first that was interesting to watch since the first parody that made front page so you get a weak 4 from me. Once again, this flash needs more orginality.

Overall: the flash needs a lot of improvement but it was better than any other numa numa submission.

Score: 0

"It's not a bad flash."

submission: One Love V2

date: January 30, 2005

Although, you didn't need to resubmit the same flash with a minor difference which I can't even find. Why didn't you simply ask the admins to edit your previous submission? They would have done it with pleasure.

As for the flash itself, the artists seem way too limited and they can't really express their talent. No background, not much frames... yup, this collab needs more organization and more space for the authors so they can show their whole potential.

As for Piconjo's part, it wasn't even made by Piconjo. I even doubt that it was made by one of his fans. That's not his style of flash at all and he told us that he didn't animate anything for this flash.

Your first submission would get a 6. This one deserves a 0 because you didn't need to resubmit the same flash twice. Next time, please edit the original one.

Good luck on your next flash.

Score: 6

"Another entertaining stick/special effects collab"

submission: Systematic

date: January 7, 2005

Elven Blender: You animation was ok, all the obstacles that your character did keep my interest but I think that it needs some moving obstacles or something that would attack him. Anyway, your special effects are fine and you surely have the talent to make a better stick action flash.

DarkThought: Best special effects of the three authors, especially for the blood. You have enough talent to make good stick action movies. That's fo shizzle.

Nioxide: The sticks were more detailed than the other animations but I thought that the flash was a little bit too short. The animation was ok though.

The menu was good looking. I suggest yoou guys to add more special effects and obstacles to your action flashes so it could be even more entertaining. Some camera zooms and weird angles could make it even more interested.

Good luck on your next flash guys. Don't rush it and have fun creating it..

_E_<Rgs>_K_

Score: 1

"Sorry but this one didn't deserve a good score."

submission: DailyToon01042005

date: January 5, 2005

It's simply a few pictures with some voices and music. Nothing special there.
Graphics: 1 No animation and the pictures weren't made by you guys. Maybe 1 or 2 were photoshopped but that's not good enough.

Sound: 5 Nothing impressive, no sound effects... at least there was something so you get a 5.

etc, etc. No need to go into the details. The menu and the preloader were decent though.

Overall: 1. I know that you guys have only one day to prepare the dailytoons but this one was still a subpar performance. I saw some decent daily toons lately but not enough efforts were made in this one.

Good luck on your next flash and you guys should consider making weekly toons instead of daily toons. It will give you guys more time to animate and it will improve the quality of your entries and I know that you guys are able to submit something good when you try.

_E_<Rgs>_K_

Score: 7

"Rofl, that was a hilarious surprise"

submission: Numa Numa Dance

date: December 11, 2004

I think it's obvious that the guy (is it you?) is reading the text of the music at the same time.

Anyway, it was entertaining and easy to follow so I will give a 7 for that small laugh that you gave me. I think that it's the first time that I see a webcam entertainement on front page since I signed up.

_E_<Rgs>_K_